I did not have much feel for the strength of ebXML in the B2B marketplace, so I was interested in performing some research.
ebXML seems a decent choice when compared to other possible choices such as EDI and AS2. I was however quite surprised when I looked at the trends for these technologies. The diagram below shows a comparison of:
EDI
AS2
ebXML
RosettaNet
from 2004 until 2009
EDI (dark blue line) has been decreasing in popularity to some degree over time, as might be expected, but it is still overwhelmingly more prominent than the other B2B technologies.
Because EDI is so much more prominent, I removed it from the equation for the graph below in order to get a clearer picture of how the other technologies stack up:
In 2004, ebXML was the most prominent of these technologies (light blue line). AS2 (yellow line) and RosettaNet (red line) were essentially neck-and-neck. Since 2007, however, AS2 has been gaining substantially in popularity. Throughout the entire time frame, ebXML has been losing popularity.
A better picture of the health of ebXML can be seen by graphing it individually:
ebXML has been in a long downward spiral for the last 4 years, and through that time its relevance seems to have diminished by a factor of 25.
Is ebXML dead? The outlook clearly does not look good, but subsequent posts will examine ebXML and its competitors in more detail. Google Trends does not provide a definitive answer to the question, but it does provide strong indications.
cisdal - simply integration